Mass Communication as a Tool for the Branding of the City
In the modern global world the existence of cities is conditioned by cutthroat competition for intellectual potential and investment attraction. The theme of territory branding in Ukraine is expected to become more significant due to the new social and economic reality. Decentralization and financial autonomy of regions and territorial communities make it inevitable to regard to the practices of territory branding and use all the available means of mass communication for the increase of territory attraction. The efforts of a city brand forming are aimed predominantly at creating such an image of a city which would captivate tourists and investors. Having said that, it is as much important to form the image of a city, comfortable for living among the local citizens. Social diagnostics of the city territory is critical for making decisions in the course of strategic city planning, creating the city brand programs. In the context of the evaluation of a city in terms of developing its brand, what must be taken to consideration are the forms of communication between people, defined by the culture of specific territories, along with the environmental dimensions of a city existance. Hence, it is essential to adapt the instruments of commercial branding to the aims of city branding, pointing out not the characteristics of the product, but the characteristics of the local culture and people.
The research focuses on the aspects of the city brand forming, the forms of primary, secondary and tertiary communication between the city and the target groups of public. The study also discloses the role of different means of mass communication in the city image forming and its branding. Furthermore, the research illustrates and analyzes different communication models of the city brand forming - Simon Anholt’s hexagon, the three major instruments of city branding - “personal association”, “imagemaking” and “event”.
The process of setting up the appropriate conditions for the city brand forming is resource- and time-consuming and is rewarding only with engaging nonmaterial resources - the complex of creative approaches which can successfully realize the potential of a city.
2. Chernatoni, L., McDonald, M. (2006). Branding. How to create a powerful brand. M oskow: UNITY-DANA, 559 p.
3. Dinnie, C. (2013). Branding territories. The best world practices. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Faber, 325 p.
4. Golubkov, E. P., Sekerin, V. D., Golubkova, E. N. (1993). Marketing: choosing the best solution. Moscow: Economics, 222 p.
5. Govers, R., Go, Fr. (2009). Place Branding: Glocal, Virtual and Physical Identities, Constructed, Imagined and Experienced. Palgrave Macmillan, 256 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.06.002 6. Karachina, N. (2016). Evolution of branding territory in the Era of change. Retrieved August, 23, 2019 from https://conferences.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/all-fm/all-fm-2016/paper/viewFile/942/511
7. Kotler, Ph., Gertner, D. (2002). Country as a brand, product and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective, The Journal of Brand Management, 9 (April 2002): 251. https://doi.org/10.1057/ palgrave.bm.2540076
8. Moilanen, T., Rainisto, S. (2009). How to Brand Nations, Cities and Destinations: A Planning Book for Place Branding. Palgrave Macmillan, 230 p. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011058626
9. Musiezdov, A. (2014). Common Sidewalk Language? Criticism of the discourse of public spaces. Ukrainian Socialogical Journal. No. 1–2, 18–22.
10. Pankrukhin, A.P. (2006). Territory Marketing. 2nd ed. SPb. : Peter, 416 p.
11. Percia, V., Mamleeva, L. (2007). Brand anatomy. Moscow: Peak, 227 p.
12. Polishko, G. G. (2015). The brand of the country is the most influential on the effect of the country. Innovatsiya Infrastructure of Ukraine: Standard and Analysis of Development: Materials of the International Science-Practical Conference (20-21 fall of 2015 p.). Odessa: ZED, 23–25.
13. Rice, E., Trout, J. (2001). Positioning: the battle for recognition. Sankt-Petersburg: Peter, 256 p.
14. Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 587 p.
15. Rodkin, P. (2019). Representation of city attractions in the branding of territories and the semiotic model of the city brand. Decorative art and subject-spatial environment. Bulletin of MGHPA. No. 1, part 2, 207-217.
16. Sachuk, T. V. (2009). Territorial marketing. Sankt-Petersburg: Peter, 368 p.
17. Salnikova, S. (2018). The Social Diagnostic of Lutsk City in the Framework of Creation of the Strategic Plan of its Development. Sociological studios, 1 (12), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.29038/2306-3971-2018-01-42-51
18. Simonin, B. (2008). Nation Branding and Public Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs. No. 32 (3), R. 19–34.
19. Szondi, G. (2008). Public diplomacy and nation branding: conceptual similarities and differences. Discussion papers in Diplomacy. The Netherlands Institute of International Relations «Clingendael». Retrieved Оctober 22, 2008 from https://www.clingendael.org/publication/public-diplomacy-and-nation-branding-conceptual-similarities-and-differences. https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2010.32
20. Vizgalov D. V. (2011). Branding a city. Moscow: Institute for Urban Economics Foundation, 160 p.
21. Ward, S. V. (1998). Selling Places: The Marketing of Towns and Cities. London: Routledge, 272 p.