Dynamics of Religious Involvement of the Population of European Countries

Keywords: religiosity, religious attendance, religious participation, types of religiosity, European Social Survey

Abstract

Despite the general tendency towards secularization in the modern world, the institute of religion still has an important role in the social and state development of society.
Using the data of the European Social Survey (2008–2016) and the methodic for measuring religious involvement (S. Salnikova), which is based on relevant indicators of religiosity (J. Billiet), the authors analyzed the level and character of religiosity in a number of European countries. The level of religiosity is an indicator of subjective institutional belonging to particular religion or denomination; under the character of religiosity, we mean the division of the variable religious involvement, which is divided into the cohort of those belonging to the main, modal and marginal types of religious involvement (these are types of in-church religious belonging), cultural type (this is a religious and cultural identification), and non-church types (in the 1st and 2nd generation).
It is revealed that the dynamics of institutional religiosity is characteristic of most countries, and in case of its absence, processes related to the character of religiosity are dynamic. Exception is Poland. Regardless of the general level of religiosity, the analysis of data in 15 European countries reveals such tendencies in religious changes as stability (Poland, France, Belgium, Estonia, Czech Republic), strengthening of institutional religiosity (Germany, Slovenia, Sweden) or its marginalization or strengthening of secular influences (Portugal , Spain, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Hungary, Finland, Norway). Reducing the level of religiosity in many countries is due to an increase in the non-church cohorts in the 1st and / or 2nd generations.

References

1. Casanova, J. (2017). On the other side of secularization: The religious and secular dynamics of our global time. Kyiv: Spirit and letter.
2. Kormina, J., Panchenko, A., Shtyrkov, S. (2017). Anthropological approaches to the study of religion: theories, methods and field experiences. Forum for Anthropology and Culture, No 35, 129–166.
3. Myronovych, D., Reshetniak, O., Salnikova, S. (2013). Religious capital and religious participation in countries of new eastern Europe. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv : Sociology, Vol. 1, 16–27.
4. Taylor, Ch. (2014). Secularity and religion. Retrieved May 20, from http://standrews.ru/assets/files/ Books/Stranici/Tejlor-iz-Pages-18-3.pdf
5. Fedorenko, M. (2013). Religiosity, identification and religious identity. Scientific journal «Scientific notes of Orel state university», No 4, 239–241.
6. Billiet, J., Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J. (2004). Assessing Cross-National Construct Equivalence in the ESS: The Case of Religious Involvement. Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality and Methodology in Official Statistics, Mainz (Germany), 24–26 May.
7. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 94, 95–120.
8. Giorgi, L. (1992). Religious Involvement in a Secularized Society. The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 43, No 4, 639–656.
9. Good, M., Willoughby, T. (2013). Institutional and Personal/Spirituality Religiosity and Psychosocial Adjustment in Adolescence. Retrieved May 20, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255975761_ Institutional_and_Personal_SpiritualityReligiosity_and_Psychosocial_Adjustment_in_Adolescence_Concurrent_and_Longitudinal_Associations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9989-2
10. Musick, M. A., House, J. S., Williams, D. R. (2004). Attendance at Religious Services and Mortality in a National Sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Vol. 45, No 2, 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 002214650404500206
11. Pippa, N., Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13213-2_98
12. Pollack, D. (2008). Religious Change in Europe: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Findings. Social Compass, 55(2), 168–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037768607089737
13. Riesebrodt, M. (2014). Religion in the Modern World : Between Secularization and Resurgence. Retrieved Mart 02, 2018 from http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/29698
14. Schieman, S. (2008). The Religious Role and the Sense of Personal Control. Sociology of Religion, Vol. 69, 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/69.3.273
15. Stol, J. (2008). Secularization Theory and Rational Choice. Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://www.academia. edu/3625376/Secularization_theory_and_rational_choice._An_integration_of_micro-_and_macrotheories_of_secularization_using_the_example_of_Switzerland._2008._in_D._Pollack_and_D.V.A._Olson_The_Role_of_Religion_in_Modern_Societies._New_York_Routledge_249–270
16. Tsaousis, I., Karademas, E., Kalatzi, D. (2012). The role of core self-evaluations in the relationship between religious involvement and subjective well-being a moderated mediation model. Mental Health, Religion & Culture. Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13674676.2011.651716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2011.651716
17. European social survey. Retrieved March 3, 2019 from http://www.europeansocialsurvey
Published
2019-06-10
Section
SOCIAL REALITY IN EMPIRICAL STUDIES