Social Changes and “Points of no Return”: an Attempt to Conceptualize

Keywords: social changes, social dynamics, value changes, conceptualization, bifurcation points

Abstract

The modern world is characterized by fluidity, changeability, and unpredictability. In particular, social life is full of events that often inspire fear, affect and have unpredictable social effects. Almost every community faces such events: economic crises, political revolutions, environmental disasters, terrorist acts, and so on. Modern sociology pays much attention to the individual consequences and causes of such events, but in practice, a deep global change is remaining uncovered. The value of the presented work consists in an attempt to conceptualize the points of noreturn, in order to introduce the possibility of analyzing such driven events and to find the connection betweenthe points of no return and value changes. As the main result of the study, the author's definition of the points of noreturn was deduced.

References

1. Shtompka, P. (1996). Sociology of social change. Moscow: Aspect-Press. 416 p.
2. Shtompka, P. (2001). Social change as an injury (article one). Sociological Research. No 1, 8–17. Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://www.isras.ru/files/File/Socis/01-2001/Shtompka.pdf.
3. Point of No Return. Retrieved October 10, 2018 from https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Point_of_ No_Return_(PNR)
4. Bevzenko, L. (2006). The evolutionary potential of the concept of social bifurcation. Sociology: theory, methods, marketing. No 2, 159–176. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/ 123456789/90311/10-Bevzenko.pdf?sequence=1.
5. Music, O. A. (2011). Bifurcations in nature and society: natural sciences and sociosynergy. Modern science-intensive technologies. No 1, 87–91. Retrieved May 20, 2018 from https://www.top-technologies.ru/en/ article/view?id=26640.
6. Makeyev, S., Oksamytna, S., Domaranska, A., Ivanov, A., Kostyuchenko, T., Malish, L., Martsenyuk, T., Stukalo, S. (2017). State singularity socialialni structure, situation, everyday practice: a monograph. Kyiv: NaUKMA. 180 p.
7. Impact of the economic crisis on social, economic and territorial cohesion of the European Union (2014). Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/دید es/hedes/join/2014/529066/IPOL-REGI_ ET(2014)529066_EN.pdf.
8. The EU, The Global Financial Crisis and its Impact on Democracy Building in Africa. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/chapters/the-role-of-the-european-union-in-democracy-building/eu-democracy- building-discussion-paper-30.pdf
9. Haan, de A. (2010). The Financial Crisis and China's «Harmonious Society». Journal of Current Chinese Affairs. No 39 (2), 69–99. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from https://d-nb.info/1024415287/34.
10. Kumar, R., Debroy, B., Ghosh, J., Mahajan, K. (2009). Global Financial Crisis: Impact on India's Poor Some Initial Perspectives. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://www.undp.org/content/dam/india/docs/impact_ of_the_financial_crisis_on_the_poor_in_india_some_initial_perspectives.pdf
11. The Greek crisis: social impact and policy responses. Manos matsaganis. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/10314.pdf
12. Whelan, T. Ch. (2016). Economic stress and the great recession in Ireland: the erosion of social class advantage. Geary Institute for Public Policy and School of Sociology, University College Dublin. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http: //www.ucd.ie/geary/static/publications/workingpapers/gearywp201613.pdf
13. Kimberly, A. (2016). Brexit Consequences for the UK, the EU, and the United States. The balance. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from https://www.thebalance.com/brexit-consequences-4062999.
14. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2009). Moldova's «twitter revolution». Journal of Democracy. Vol. 20. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http: //www.sar.org.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Moldova-Twitter-Revolution.pdf. https://doi.org/ 10.1353/jod.0.0102
15. Tsikhelashvilix, K. (2011). Georgia four years after the rose revolution. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://smr.gov.ge/Uploads/GEORGIA_FO_837cae16.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00150
16. E cooperación. Catalonia in Spain. For Democrat (2011). Retrieved October 15, 2018 from http://www.exteriores.gob.es/Portal/es/SalaDePrensa/Multimedia/Publicaciones/Documents/Porlaconvivencia/POR%20LA%20CONVIVENCIA%20DEMOCRATICA%20ENG.pdf
17. Kucheva, A. V. (2016). Concept of Cultural Injury and the Possibility of Its Application to the Interpretation of Historical Events. Diploma. No 8 (70). Retrieved October 10, 2017 from http://scjournal.ru/articles/issn_1997-292X_2016_8_32.pdf.
18. Alok, J. (2018). Hungary toxic sludge spill an 'ecological catastrophe' says government. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/05/hungary-toxic-sludge -spill
19. Boswell, Ch. (2000). European Values and the Asylum Crisis. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). Vol. 76, No 3, Europe: Where Does It Begin and End?, 537-557. Retrieved October 15, 2018 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2625953?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20. Migration and refugee crisis (2013) http://aecpa.es/uploads/files/Migration-and-refugee-crisis-1.pdf
21. Golovakha, Ye. (2006). Main stages and trends in transformation of Ukrainian society, by restructuring the «Orange Revolution». Sociology: theory, methods, marketing. No 3, 32–51. Retrieved February 16, 2018 from http://i-soc.com.ua/institute/smonit_2006.php.
22. Stryk, E. (2010). Singularuty as a limit of innovate society. Bulletin of the Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University. Retrieved February 16, 2018 from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/singulyarnost-kak-predel-innovatsionnogo-obschestva
Published
2019-06-10
Section
SOCIOLOGY: CURRENT, DISPUTABLE